Maximiliano Korstanje 
University of Palermo, Argentina & University of Leeds, UK. 
Babu George
Fort Hays State University, US
Resumen
La siguiente presentación encarna una investigación sobre  un tema poco investigado, pero muy presente en la vida cotidiana, el sindrome  postvacacional. En forma reciente observa como  muchas personas caen  en casos de depression y adquieren otros sintomas que alertan a familiares. Se  ha observado una correlación entre la tasa de divorcios y las vacaciones que  merece ser estudiada. Según los estudiosos de este syndrome, las expectativas  de las vacaciones son tan grandes que, al retorno es dificil compaginarlas con  la vida cotidiana. Según esta teoría, los divorcios serían resultado de la  converncia entre expectativas muy altas sobre el destino soñado, con  desequilibrios de naturaleza interna.  
Key Words. Sindrome post vacacional, Psicología, Consumo,  Paraiso Pérdido. 
Abstract
The present investigation is framed under an uncanny  social issue, which is present in day to day life, but remained unchecked up to  date. It is common to see how many holiday-makers fall in depression or start  legal separations once returned to home after dream holidays. It is seen how there  is a certain correlation between rate of divorce and the ends of holidays which  merits to be explored. Per the preliminary studies, high-expectances correspond  with serious glitches to be inserted in daily routine. Following this theory,  the rise of divorce would be a result from the marketing role inflating the  consumption and the allegory of lost paradise, though some specialist do not  discard problems in the internal nature of peoples.
Key Words. Post Vacational Syndrome, Psychology,  Consumption, Lost Paradise.   
Para citar este artículo puede uitlizar el siguiente formato: 
Maximiliano Korstanje y Babu George (2015): Post-Vacation Divorce Syndrome: Are Holidays Leading to Divorces, Revista Turydes: Turismo y Desarrollo, n. 19 (diciembre 2015). En línea: http://www.eumed.net/rev/turydes/19/divorces.html
Introduction
   
Holidays today serve as mechanisms to revitalize from the  frustration experienced during working life (Krippendorf, 1982). The industry  of tourism is considered not only one of the most growing resources for the economy,  but also the “totem” of societal order (Maccannell 1976). Nonetheless, over  recent years we found some pathological syndromes in holiday makers post  vocational contexts. This is dubbed as “post vacation syndrome” or “post  vacation blues”, definable as a state of character caused by the return to home  or the re-routing of life after periods of vacations.  Known as Monday  blues as well, it exhibits insomnia, distress, depression, or a rise of  conflict which even leads toward divorces. 
   Conceptual Discussion
   As Korstanje & Busby (2011) put it, holidays  represent a sacred-time where peoples not only are revitalized, their burdens  are revised, but emulate the quest for the lost-paradise. Most certainly, leisure  time gives to subject the possibility to liberate all repressed drives and  frustrations. In so doing, the cultural values of society are inscribed in the holiday  maker. As a rite of passage, tourism brings the needs of purification proper of  religion. Joseph Campbell observed that the term paradise comes from Persian terms Pairi (outskirt) and Daeza  (damned space). Together, the word connotes to a place of prosperity impossible  for human beings because of their original sin. The sense of lost-Eden contributed  in the West to forge a much deeper needs of re-conquest or return to the  exemplary centre (Campbell & Moyers 2011).   
   To some extent, this syndrome can be explained by the  shocking encounter between the leisure and working modes of our brains. To put  this bluntly, holiday-makers are so visually-stimulated during their leave that  any sudden end entails a state of depression. 
   Eric Cohen (1982) argues convincingly, this is one of  the characteristics of modern tourism from its outset.  On one hand, marketing messages of tourist  destinations emulate heaven encouraging the logic of abundance and by  restricting the entrance of all but the chosen few. The combination of being in  and out is one of the relevant aspects that determine “paradise”. Could Adam  & Eve live in the paradise forever? A perfect paradise should be defined by  perfect exclusivity and the possibility of a permanent stay for anyone clearly  violates such exclusivity. This hermeneutic circle is restricted to those who  do not deserve to be slaved (Cohen 1982). Other interesting finding can be  found in Maccannell (1976), Salazar (2010) and Korstanje & Thirkettle  (2013).  
   American anthropologist Nelson Graburn (1983) confirmed  not only displacement causes some types of anxieties, but it wakes up an  existential crisis which is regulated by an “allegory” fabricated by society.  This allegory tells a story dividing what is right and wrong. By accepting  tourism as a social institution, we involuntarily ascribe to the societal  values.  In this vein, Korstanje in  earlier studies reminds that tourism is viewed as a correct behavior always the  traveller do not manifest intentions to exceed the borders of hospitality. At  time, leisure travellers become in illegal migrants they are pursued, jailed  and deported (Korstanje, 2015). However, since tourism is a rite of passage,  any glitch in the process may provoke the disintegration of the in-group  loyalty (Turner, 1995). 
   Capitalism and Divorces
   One of the first disputes  around divorce comes from Henry VIII who parted company with Vatican to  reach his divorce. Now it has become in an epidemic primarily because of  marital discord, infidelity, or children abuse. In his introduction to one of  the best guidebooks on divorce, Robert E Emery, the editor, puts that  low-income in families seem to be a key factor for people to divorce in United States and Europe.  However, it is not determinant. While some countries like India have  lower rates of divorce, the First world faces one of the most exorbitant  growths of divorce-related rates. Secondly, divorce affects not only the mental  health of parents and their children but also changes radically the economic  structure of society (Emery, 2013). C. Lasch established a more than  interesting thesis that relates divorce (social ties decline) to the surface of  a new narcissism where people avoid Other-commitment (Lasch, 1991). Following  this working hypothesis, Ming Cui (2013) defines “commitment” as the intention  to keep stable relationships in a long-term. As a result of the combination of  personal dedication with external or situational constraints, Cui adds,  satisfaction plays a crucial role in the configuration of marital attachments.  However, there are forces who determine the degree of commitment with the  couple, no matter than the personal intentions. Most likely, some personalities  may experience fear if commitment which leads to pour parental  experiences.  
   Though sociology has exerted considerable criticism on  tourism in view of alienatory nature or the trend to commoditize landscapes,  cultures and peoples (Debord 1967, Maccannell 1976; Urry, 1992), no less true  is that travels engender liminal spaces of tension and conflict not always is  correctly resolved. Indeed, what is more than interesting to discuss is to what  an extent, holidays play a crucial role in precipitating marital tensions to  consolidate divorces.  Ronald Inglehart  says that divorces as a clear sign of social decomposition, enrooted in the  core of post-industrial life. The advance of leisure and service industries  weakened the social relationships of workers, accelerating the stage of  secularization. The sense of autonomy, self-independence and achievement placed  men in competition of women, creating serious conflicts for couples (Inglehart,  1997). 
   Some recent statistics show the rise of divorce rates  worldwide. Not only, families are placed in the context of change by the rise  of informal civil unions but 50% of American families have a second marriage.  Following this, the average impact of marriage/union interruption is almost 3/7  years 1.  This social fragmentation produces negative  consequences for children who spend less time with their parents or even inside  the couple by the increase of intra-marital violence. Some ciphers show that in  Argentina  one of three divorces is encouraged by women. From 2001 to 2010, in Argentina were almost  564396 legal divorces. Whether in 80s decade almost 114 couples divorced in a  daily basis, this decreased to 87. However, something changed from 2001 to  2010, where statistics reveal almost 172 divorces per day. One from 3 cases turns  in divorces forced in post-holiday environments (Himitian, 2012).  
   Far from finding a solution for this, the present  commentary piece is aimed at introducing the problem into tourism and  hospitality fields. In the coming years, further empirical background should be  necessary. Hypothetically, divorces and post vocational syndrome would be  inextricably intertwined. 
   The involving statistical information was obtained  from the official department of Statistics of Buenos Aires, Government and  Information managed by Dirección General de Estadística y Censos (Ministerio de  Hacienda GCBA). Estadísticas Vitales (General Direction of statistics and  Census, Ministry of Economy, GCBA. It is important to remind that outcomes of  this research are not based on samples which are statistically representative Argentina all;  for that reason, extrapolations beyond the present unit of analysis are not  recommendable. The information discussed below applies only for Buenos Aires City, Buenos Aires Distrito Capital. 
   As per statistics of  Buenos Aires city (Argentina), divorce rates have not varied significantly from  1990 to 2012, however, if further attention to the relation marriage-divorce is  drawn in table 2, interesting outcome are found. 
   Table 2 evinces the rise of the index from 36.4 in 1990 to 46.3 in 2012. This index  measures the number of divorces respecting to marriages. This means that the  increase of divorce rates is correlative with the decrease of marriages.  Starting from this premise, it is necessary to discuss to what extent holidays  are determinant in the divorce rates. 
   The information above (table 3) reports the index of  divorces disaggregated by month (from January to December of 2012).  Unlike the Northern hemisphere, summer-seasons  are registered in the months of January, February and March. At a first glance,  in the year January is the month with fewer divorces (206) followed by February  359. In  this vein, holidays seem not to correlate to divorces unless by the fact that March  escalated to 609 cases of divorces. It is interesting to not lose the sight  that per this index we pass from 3.68 in January to 10.38 in March. Not  surprisingly, legal separations are submitted time earlier or later from  vacations. This poses a serious challenge to our insight because we have not  accurate points of departure about when the rupture was. Anyway, we may  accomplish alternative advances with the same information. Distributed the  information by trimester (tiers), we find that the first tier, which range from  January to March, gathers 1.184 cases of divorces while the last tier  (encompassing October, November and December) contains 1.664 cases. In view of  that, it can be thought holidays are not the real cause of divorce, as  originally thought, but affects the social bonds in some way (it is not  possible to determine unless by qualitative methods). As Victor Turner puts it,  social disaggregation is marked by the presence of key dates which can  potentiate the conflict if it exists. Celebrations and Feasts as Christmas or  New Year are disorganizing events for familiar unit. Based on the idea that  emotional rupture is accelerated by the advance of New Year (instead of  summer-season), we understand why March has reached the peak of divorce rates  than other months. Although the information is not determinant and cannot be  extrapolated to another sources and scenarios, two relevant aspects are clear.  Firstly, divorces are accelerated by the Christmas and New Year. In  conflict-latent contexts, holidays and vocational post syndrome would play a  crucial role in triggering the decision of divorce in the couple.  What would be more important to debate is to  what extent, the illusion or fictionality of dream-world holidays contribute to  the observed divorce rates. The post-vocational syndrome offers a fertile ground  to continue empirical investigation in next approaches. 
   Conclusion
   The evidence provided by us gives some new insights  into the post-vacation distress syndrome, timidly explored by experimental  psychology. Neither leisure-travel nor holidays alone produce the crisis that  led couples towards legal separations; yet, these create “crisis of vital  cycles”. Turner argues that cultures elaborate rites of passage in order for the  Gods to be thanked or absolved for the prosperity achieved or the material deprivation  suffered. 
   Whenever social ties are not strong enough, as the  case for modern social life, the involving group faces discrepancies and  conflicts, which if not dully regulated may lead to decomposition. The global  tendency of increased divorces not only seems to be unquestionable, but also  advocates for the concern of the founding parents of sociology that ties in  social contracts are being weakened. 
   Limitations of this research should be mentioned. The  sample has been drawn on the divorces data of 2012 in the Buenos Aires city (Registro Civil de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires). Also, since the method  employed by the local government gets changed often, it is almost impossible to  compare information year by year. 
   References
   Campbell, J., & Moyers, B. (2011). The power of myth. New York, Anchor.
Cui, M et al. (2013) “The Continuation of Intimate Partner Violence from Adolescence to Young Adulthood”. J Marriage Family 75 (2): 300-313
Debord, G. (1967). The society of the spectacle. New York, University of Toronto Press.
Emery, R. (2013) “Introduction”. Cultural Sociology of Divorce. London, Palgrave. Pp. xxvii-xxx
Graburn, N. H (1983). The Anthropology of Tourism. Annals of Tourism Research. Vol. 10 (1)
Himitian, E (2012) “Hubo más de medio millón de divorcios en la última década”. La Nación. 04 de Marzo de 2012. Available http://www.lanacion.com.ar/1453694-hubo-mas-de-medio-millon-de-divorcios-en-la-ultima-decada. Retrieved 20-January 2015.
Inglehart, R. (1997) Modernization and Postmodernization. Cultural, economic, and political  change in 43 societies. New Jersey, Princeton University Press. 
   Korstanje, M (2015).  “Reviewing the concept of hospitality in a contemporary World”. Repository of  Centre for Ethnicity and Racism. School  of Sociology, University of Leeds,  Working Paper No 28. Available at http://cers.leeds.ac.uk/files/2015/06/Korstanje_CERS_6.pdf 
Korstanje, M., & Busby, G. (2010).  “Understanding the Bible as the roots of physical displacement: the origin of  tourism”. E-Review of Tourism Research, 8(3), 95-111 
   MacCannell,  D. (1976). The tourist: A new theory of the leisure class. Berkeley: University   of California Press.
Lasch, C. (1991). The culture of narcissism: American life in an age of diminishing expectations. WW Norton & Company.
Krippendorf, J. (1982). “Towards new tourism policies: The importance of environmental and sociocultural factors”. Tourism management, 3(3), 135-148.
Salazar, N. B. (2010). Towards an anthropology of cultural mobilities. Crossings: Journal of Migration & Culture, 1(1), 53-68.
Thirkettle, A., & Korstanje, M. E. (2013). Creating a new epistemiology for tourism and hospitality disciplines. International Journal of Qualitative Research in Services, 1(1), 13-34.
Turner, V. (1995). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. New York, Transaction Publishers.
Urry, J. (1992). “The tourist gaze “revisited”. American Behavioral Scientist, 36(2), 172-186.
Los comentarios al artículo son responsabilidad exclusiva del remitente.
Si necesita algún tipo de información referente al articulo póngase en contacto con el email suministrado por el autor del articulo al principio del mismo.
Un comentario no es mas que un simple medio para comunicar su opinion a futuros lectores.
El autor del articulo no esta obligado a responder o leer comentarios referentes al articulo.
Al escribir un comentario, debe tener en cuenta que recibirá notificaciones cada vez que alguien escriba un nuevo comentario en este articulo.
Eumed.net se reserva el derecho de eliminar aquellos comentarios que tengan lenguaje inadecuado o agresivo.
Si usted considera que algún comentario de esta página es inadecuado o agresivo, por favor,pulse aqui.