Георги Пенчев1

Para citar este artículo puede utilizarse el siguiente formato:

Георги Пенчев (2012): “Social Function of Bulgarian Environmental Law”, en Revista Crítica de Historia de las Relaciones Laborales y de la Política Social, n.o 4-5 (marzo 2012/noviembre 2012). En línea:

Резюме: Тази статия е посветена на социалната функция на българското екологично право. Вниманието е насочено към 4 основни аспекти на тази функция: а) основното право на здравословна и благоприятна околна среда; б) правната защита на лечебните растения; в) правната защита на курортните ресурси; г) правният режим на защитените природни територии в светлината на туризма и отдиха на гражданите.

Ключови думи: Българско екологично право, социална функция.

Abstract: This article is dedicated to social function of Bulgarian environmental law. The attention is paid to 4 major aspects of this function: a) fundamental right of the citizens to a healthy and favourable environment; b) legal protection of medicinal plants; c) legal protection of resort resources; d) legal regime of specially protected natural areas in the light of tourism and relaxation of the citizens.

Key words: Bulgarian Environmental Law, Social Function.

1. Preface

The antropogenic impact on the environment during last decades is increased through various forms and dimensions. This fact increases the role and importance of the environmental law as a branch of law which regulates various relations between society and nature. The social function of environmental law is related to the legal possibilities for citizens of every country to live and work in a favourable and healthy environment and to use rationally natural resources for the purposes of tourism, relaxation, medical rehabilitation and other health purposes. This function is closely linked with the Principle 1 of the Declaration of the United Nations on the Human Environment (Stockholm, 1972) where is stated that man has the fundamental right to adequate conditions of life in an environment1 . In the Bulgarian environmental legislation2 are regulated some legal tools which could be shown as a specific aspects of its social function. In my opinion, the social function of the Bulgarian environmental law has 4 aspects, as follows: a) fundamental right of the citizens to a healthy and favourable environment 3; b) legal protection of medicinal plants; c) legal protection of resort resources; d) legal regime of specially protected natural areas in the light of the tourism and relaxation of citizens. They will be examined below in brief in accordance with the state of the Bulgarian legislation as of October 29, 2013.

2. Fundamental right of the Bulgarian citizens to a healthy and favourable environment

The fundamental right to healthy and favourable environment of the Bulgarian citizens is proclaimed in art. 55, sent. 1 of the Constitution of the Republic of Bulgaria4 where is stated that “Citizens shall have the right of healthy and favourable environment in accordance with the established standards and norms” 5. The terms ‘standards’ and ‘norms’ must be interpreted as various kinds of limited admissible levels of polluting substances (i. e. related to the quality of the environment) or related to the quantity of the environment, including legal regimes of activities in specially protected natural areas or protected zones. These ‘standards and norms’ must ensure the ecological equilibrium and sustainable development. They are regulated in sectorial environmental legislation.

3. Legal protection of medicinal plants

The medicinal plants find application in medicine, especially in folk medicine, pharmaceutics, cosmetics and food industry. Their legal regulation is focused in the Medicinal Plant Act of 2000 6. It can be mentioned following legal tools for the protection of this natural resource under this act: A) obligation for the owners of lands, forests and water objects to take the necessary measures for protection of the medicinal plants located there (art. 7); B) prohibition for use of these plants in a way which do harm to them as well as to their habitats (art. 9); C) permits for economic use of medicinal plants (art. 21-41); D) adoption of plans for protection of these plants (art. 50-55); E) monitoring of the state of the medicinal plants, provided by Ministry of environment and waters (art. 56-57); F) control over activities related to these plants by the competent state and local authorities (art. 58-64)7 .

4. Legal protection of resort resources

The resort resources have big importance for health and the development of the tourism (including balneological) and relaxation of the population. In Bulgaria they are subject for protection mainly under public health legislation in comparison with the Russion Federation where they are regulated in the environmental legislation as a kind of specially protected natural areas. The Bulgarian Health Act (HA) of 2004 8 includes a subchapter (art. 75-78), dedicated to protection of these kind of natural resources in the scope of chapter VIII on activities for protection of public health. According to art. 75, sec. 1 of HA, the term ‘resort resources’ includes mineral water, medicinal mud and beaches. It can be mentioned following legal tools for the protection of these resources under this act: A) right of the Government with decision to specify borders and conditions for the development of the resorts as areas, including resort resources (art. 76, sec. 2); B) right of Ministry of environment and waters (MEW), Ministry of Health, Ministry of Regional Development and Ministry of Economy and Energetics to establish with regulation the regime of activities in resorts, related to the use of resort resources (art. 77); C) right of places of resorts (i. e. hospitals, rehabilitation centres, etc.) to use mineral water and medicinal mud for the purposes of their activity (art. 78).

5. Legal regime of specially protected natural areas for the purposes of tourism and relaxation of the citizens

The specially protected natural areas usually are promulgated mainly for conservation, scientific and aesthetic purposes. However, the social function of environmental law in this field is related to their use for the purposes of tourism and relaxation of citizens but in accordance with established restrictions to guarantee the ecological equilibrium and sustainable development in these areas. The Bulgarian Protected Territories Act of 1998 9 specifies 6 categories of specially protected natural areas, as follows: reservs, maintained reservs, national parks, natural parks, protected countrysides and ‘natural remarkabilities’ (i. e. natural monuments) (art. 5). It can be mentioned following legal tools for the protection of abovementioned areas under this act: A) right of the MEW to categorize and promulgate specially protected natural areas with Order, published in SG (art. 35 and art. 47, p. 2) after special procedure for this promulgation (art. 36-45); B) adoption of management plans for these areas by the Government – on national and natural parks, and by the MOW – on reservs, maintained reservs, protected countrysides and natural remarkabilities (art. 60, sec. 1 and art. 61) after special procedure for this adoption (art. 55-66); C) special rules on the legal characterization and regime of activities in specially protected natural areas (art. 16-34).

The more restrictive measures for human activities are established in the scope of reservs and natural reservs where is forbidden all kinds of economic activity, but tourism could be developed there only in accordance with the restrictive regime of that territories. The difference between reservs and natural reservs consist in the presence of endangered species of wild fauna and flora (endemic and relictant from the point of view of biology) in the area of natural reservs. More possibilities for tourism and relaxation are established in the area of national and natural parks. In management plans of these parks must be envisaged ‘touristic zone’. The difference between national park and natural park consist in the possibility for human settlements to be available in the territory of natural parks. The natural remarkabilities and protected countrysides are also suitable for tourism and relaxation in accordance with the established regime for activities in their territoty in Order of promulgation of the MEW and respective management plan 10.

6. Concusions

Finaly it could be carried out some general conclusions from examined Bulgarian regulation in this field. The social function of the Bulgarian environmental law has an important meaning for the achievement of sustainable development. It is related to securing of favourable and health conditions for life and work of the citizens. The development of tourism and rehabilitation of the citizens is closely linked with the environmental requirements to some activities, regulated in sectorial environmental legislation, and especially in the legislation on resort resources, medicinal plants and specially protected natural areas; the complex and complicated character of contemporary environmental problems requires an efficient collaboration between scientists and practicing experts from different fields of science and social practice.

Recibido el 28 de noviembre de 2012 y aceptado el 30 de noviembre de 2012. Corregido en 2013.

1 A/Conf.48/14. For more details about this declaration, see Kiss, A., Shelton, D. International Environmental Law, London, 1991, p. 39-40.

2 See about the structure of the Bulgarian environmental legislation, Penchev, G. Bulgarian environment policy, in Water & environment manager, Lavenham (England), 1999, № 6, р. 22-23.

3 The legal problems on safety and health at work traditionally are investigated in the labour law literature, that is why they can not be examined in this article. For more details on the environmental aspects of protection of working environment in the Еuropean Union and Bulgaria see Пенчев, Г. Екологоправниаспектинаопазванетонаработнатасредапоевропейскотоправо, in Юридическисборник, Бургас, 2011, т. ХVІІІ, с. 49-81 (in translation from Bulgarian: Penchev, G. Environmental Aspects of Protection of Working Environment under European Law, in Juridical Medley, Bourgas, 2011, t. XVIII, p. 49-81).

4 See ‘State Gazette of the Republic of Bulgaria’ (SG), No. 56 of 1991, as amended.

5 For more details on the legal essence of this human right, see Панова, В. Правоназдравословнаиблагоприятнаоколнасреда, in Основниправаначовекаигражданина, София, 1998, с. 134-140 (in translation from Bulgarian: Panova, V. Right of the citizens of the Republic of Bulgaria to healthy and favourable environment, in Fundamental rights of man and citizen, Sofia, 1998, p. 134-140); Пенчев, Г. ПравонагражданитенаРепубликаБългарияназдравословнаиблагоприятнаоколнасреда, in Проблеми на морското право, София, 1994, № 1, с. 57-62 (in translation from Bulgarian: Penchev, G. Right of the citizens of the Republic of Bulgaria to healthy and favourable environment, in Problems of the Law of the Sea, Sofia, 1994, No. 1, p. 57-62). In Russian legal literature this problem is analysed by M. Brinchuk – see Бринчук, М. Экологическое право, Москва, 2009, с. 325 (in translation from Russian: Brinchuk, M. Environmental Law, Moskow, 2009, p. 325). In Polish legal literature L. Lukashuk and A. Tomashevski investigate the link between protection of health and pollution of the environment in the light of international law – see Lukaszuk, L., Tomaszewski, A. Ochrona zdrowia a wspolczesne ryzyka zagrozen za strony srodowiska naturalnego, in Ochrona zdrowia w stosunkach miedzynarodowich: wybrane zagadnienia, Warszawa, 2013, p. 63-71.

6 See SG, No. 29 of 2000, as amended.

7 See for more details, Пенчев, Г. Правна защита на лечебните растения, in Правото – изкуство за доброто и справедливото, Пловдив, 2013, с. 199-206 (in translation from Bulgarian: Penchev, G. Legal protection of medicinal plants, in Law – art of good and justice, Plovdiv, 2013, p. 199 - 206).

8 See SG, No. 70 of 2004, as amended.

9 See SG, No. 133 of 1998, as amended.

10 See for more details about Bulgarian legislation in this field: Божанов, С. Законодателна уредба в областта на околната среда, София, 2006, с. 223-228 (in translation from Bulgarian: Bozhanov, S. Legislative Regulation in the Field of the Environment, Sofia, 2006, p. 223-228); Наумова, С. Основни въпроси на екологичното право, София, 2012, с. 214-216 (in translation from Bulgarian: Naoumova, S. General Questions of Environmental Law, Sofia, 2012, p. 214-216); Пенчев, Г. Правен режим на защитените природни територии, in Собственост и право, София, 2002, № 5, с. 5-8 (in translation from Bulgarian: Penchev, G. Legal Regime of Specially Protected Natural Areas, in Ownership and Law, Sofia, 2002, No. 5, p. 5 - 8); Стайнов, П. Защита на природата (правни изследвания), София, 1970, с. 60-69 (in translation from Bulgarian: Staynov, P. Protection of Nature (Legal Research), Sofia, 1970, p. 60 - 69). On environmental legislation in this field in some other countries see: Бринчук, М. Цит. съч., с. 320-334 (in translation: Brinchuk, M. Op.cit., p. 320-334); Hughes, D. Environmental Law, London, 1992, p. 167-171, 173-177 and 179-183; Shelton, D., Kiss, A. Judicial Handbook on Environmental Law, Nairobi, 2005, p. 98 - 100.

Nota Importante a Leer:

Los comentarios al artículo son responsabilidad exclusiva del remitente.

Si necesita algún tipo de información referente al artículo póngase en contacto con el email suministrado por el autor del artículo al principio del mismo.

Un comentario no es más que un simple medio para comunicar su opinión a futuros lectores.

El autor del artículo no está obligado a responder o leer comentarios referentes al artículo.

Al escribir un comentario, debe tener en cuenta que recibirá notificaciones cada vez que alguien escriba un nuevo comentario en este artículo. se reserva el derecho de eliminar aquellos comentarios que tengan lenguaje inadecuado o agresivo.

Si usted considera que algún comentario de esta página es inadecuado o agresivo, por favor, pulse aquí.

Comentarios sobre este artículo:

No hay ningún comentario para este artículo.

Si lo desea, puede completar este formulario y dejarnos su opinion sobre el artículo. No olvide introducir un email valido para activar su comentario.
(*) Ingresar el texto mostrado en la imagen

(*) Datos obligatorios

LA REVISTA CRÍTICA DE HISTORIA DE LAS RELACIONES LABORALES Y DE LA POLÍTICA SOCIAL, con ISSN versión on line 2173-0822 e ISSN versión impresa en papel 2386-6039, es una revista académica, editada y mantenida por Servicios Académicos Intercontinentales S.L.
Sitio alojado en Gunzenhausen, distrito de Weissenburg-Gunzenhausen, Baviera, República Federal de Alemania. Alojada en

Para cualquier comunicación, envíe un mensaje a o

Director: Manuel J. Peláez
Editor: Juan Carlos Martínez Coll

    ISSN versión on line 2173-0822
ISSN versión impresa en papel 2386-6039


Número Actual
Normas de Publicación
Evaluadores Externos
Consejo de Redacción
Otras Revistas de EUMEDNET > Revistas > historia